0678786 BC Ltd v Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Robert W. Staley
Raj S. Sahni
Jonathan G. Bell
Ilan Ishai
Grant N. Stapon
Voorheis & Co. LLP
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
0678786 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Poole Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Jeffrey D. Poole

8028702 Canada Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Poole Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Jeffrey D. Poole

Jeffrey Poole
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented

Case Overview: Bennett Jones LLP and Voorheis & Co. LLP applied for a civil contempt declaration against 0678786 B.C. Ltd., 8028702 Canada Inc., and their lawyer, Jeffrey Poole, for failing to comply with previous court orders regarding solicitor-client privileged information.

  • Background:
    • Bennett Jones LLP inadvertently sent privileged information belonging to Voorheis & Co. LLP to Jeffrey Poole, counsel for 067 and 802. The court previously found the information was not handled properly.
    • The court had issued orders to cease further disclosure and to rectify previous disclosures, which were violated, leading to contempt proceedings.
  • Phase 1 Decision: The court established liability for civil contempt but deferred the decision on consequences.
  • Phase 2 (Current Decision): Despite the contempt being purged (compliance achieved), the court was asked to impose penalties and indemnity costs for the contempt.

Key Findings:

  • Declaration of Contempt: The court declared 067, 802, and Jeffrey Poole in contempt, noting intentional non-compliance and failure to promptly rectify breaches.

  • Consequences:
    • A monetary penalty of $50,000 was imposed on all three for Bennett Jones, and another penalty covering two-thirds of legal costs (around $316,667) for Voorheis & Co.
  • Costs: Additional costs awarded against the contemnors for legal proceedings at an enhanced rate (twice Schedule C costs).
  • Reasoning: The court emphasized the importance of solicitor-client privilege, the need to deter similar conduct, and the serious implications of defying court orders, especially by legal professionals.

This decision stresses respect for court orders and solicitor-client privilege, even after compliance has been achieved.

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1701 17308, 1801 07870
Civil litigation
$ 366,667
Applicant