Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Smile
SCOTIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Law Firm / Organization
Devry Smith Frank LLP
Lawyer(s)

Yonatan Kramer

WAYNE CHRISTOPHER SMILE
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
JENNIFER ANN-MARIE SMILE
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented

Key Points:

  • Background:
    • The case revolves around a mortgage agreement from December 2017 for the defendants' property in Georgina, Ontario.
    • The defendants, Wayne Christopher Smile and Jennifer Ann-Marie Smile, defaulted on October 13, 2023, and were served a demand for payment on January 16, 2024.
    • No payment was made, leading to a Default Judgment on March 21, 2024, requiring the defendants to pay $354,098 and surrender possession of the property.
  • Defendants' Motion:
    • On August 21, 2024, the defendants sought to set aside the Default Judgment, citing unconventional documents titled "Non-Negotiable Notice of Acceptance" and "Certificate of Dishonour."
    • They argued under Rule 19.08 of Ontario's Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows setting aside default judgments under certain conditions.
  • Court's Decision:
    • The court rejected the motion, finding:
      • The defendants did not promptly bring the motion or provide a valid reason for the delay.
      • Their submitted documents did not constitute a legal defense.
    • The motion was dismissed, and the Default Judgment remained in effect.

Conclusion:

The defendants' arguments, based on legally invalid documents, were dismissed, and the court upheld the original possession order in favor of Scotia Mortgage Corporation.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-3926
Real estate
$ 354,098
Plaintiff