Heritage Property Corporation v Triovest Inc
Heritage Property Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Walsh LLP
Lawyer(s)

Teddy E. Nobles

Seventh Avenue Property Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Walsh LLP
Lawyer(s)

Teddy E. Nobles

Stuart Block Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Walsh LLP
Lawyer(s)

Teddy E. Nobles

Triovest Inc.
Triovest Properties Inc.
1704873 Alberta Inc.
1908762 Alberta Ltd.
John Doe Corporations 1 to 10
City of Calgary

Background:

  • Dispute:
    • Heritage Property Corporation, Seventh Avenue Property Corporation, Stuart Block Inc. (Plaintiffs) sued Triovest Inc., Triovest Properties Inc., and related entities.(Defendants) for breach of a real estate purchase agreement concerning Lot 13, part of a redevelopment project in Calgary called the Landmark Centre.
    • The agreement required Defendants to provide a non-opposition letter supporting Plaintiffs’ re-zoning application, which Defendants did. However, Defendants later opposed Plaintiffs’ development permit.

Key Legal Issues:

  1. Breach of Contract: Plaintiffs argued that Defendants breached the purchase agreement by opposing the development permit after agreeing not to oppose the re-zoning.
  2. Good Faith: Plaintiffs claimed Defendants violated their duty to act in good faith under the contract.

Procedural History:

  • The case was summarily dismissed by Master Robertson in 2019, ruling that Defendants were only obligated to provide non-opposition for the re-zoning, not the development permit.
  • Plaintiffs appealed this dismissal and Defendants countered with an application to dismiss the appeal for delay.

Decision:

  • Appeal Dismissed: The court upheld the summary dismissal, affirming that the Defendants fulfilled their contractual obligations by not opposing the re-zoning. The contract did not prevent Defendants from opposing the development permit.
  • Delay Application Denied: Defendants’ request to dismiss the appeal for delay was denied, as much of the delay was due to circumstances beyond the Plaintiffs’ control.
  • No monetary award specified.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1701 12494
Real estate
Defendant