Baron Real Estate Investments Ltd v Tri-Arrow Industrial Recovery Inc
Baron Real Estate Investments Ltd
Law Firm / Organization
Bennett Jones LLP
Tri-Arrow Industrial Recovery Inc
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Stericycle, ULC
Stericycle Inc
474588 Alberta Ltd operating as Riteway Vacuum Service
Law Firm / Organization
Field LLP
Lawyer(s)

Peter D. Gibson

Alberta Production Machining Ltd
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Nichols Environmental (Canada) Ltd
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

The case Baron Real Estate Investments Ltd v Tri-Arrow Industrial Recovery Inc involves a lease dispute over land used for hazardous waste disposal, with Baron Real Estate Investments (Plaintiff) leasing land to Tri-Arrow Industrial Recovery Inc (Defendant), which was later acquired by Stericycle.

Key Points:

  • Lease and Dispute:
    • Tri-Arrow leased land from Baron in 2011 for hazardous waste disposal.
    • Lease required remediation of any environmental damage.
    • Tri-Arrow was acquired by Stericycle in 2013.
    • In 2014, Baron terminated the lease and re-entered the land, seizing assets, which led to a court dispute.
  • Plaintiff's Claims:
    • Tri-Arrow and Stericycle violated environmental laws, caused contamination, and failed to remediate the land.
    • The lease termination was due to multiple breaches, including improper hazardous waste handling.
  • Defendants' Position:
    • The defendants deny the allegations, asserting they followed environmental laws and that the termination of the lease was accepted.
  • Litigation Timeline:
    • Plaintiff commenced the action in 2015. There were delays in proceeding, and key supplemental records were produced in 2021.
  • Application for Dismissal:
    • Defendants sought dismissal for long delay under Rule 4.33, arguing the supplemental records produced by the plaintiff did not significantly advance the case.
  • Court’s Decision:
    • The court held that the plaintiff’s production of supplemental records was significant and genuine, and dismissed the defendants' application for dismissal. Monetary award was not specified.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1503 06113
Real estate
Plaintiff