Smith v Rutledge
Aaron Smith
Law Firm / Organization
Baldry Sugden LLP
Lawyer(s)

Darin Wight

Rockford Roy Rutledge
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Canadian Gunhub Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Rockford Industries Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Key Facts:

  • Parties: Aaron Smith (Plaintiff) and Rockford Rutledge, Canadian Gunhub Inc. (CGH), Rockford Industries Corp. (Defendants).
  • Smith and Rutledge partnered to build a shooting range and handgun business (CGH).
  • The relationship soured, leading to a settlement in 2022 where CGH owed Smith $70,000, payable in installments.
  • CGH defaulted on the payments, making only one $2,000 installment.
  • Rutledge transferred CGH's assets to another company he owned (RIC), dissolved CGH, and continued operating the business.

Plaintiff's Claims:

  • Smith sought to hold Rutledge personally liable, claiming Rutledge engaged in fraudulent transfers to shield assets and avoid paying the settlement.
  • He also argued that the asset transfer from CGH to RIC was fraudulent.

Court's Findings:

  1. Release: Did not protect Rutledge from claims as the release covered only past actions, not future fraudulent conduct.
  2. Fraud Claim: The court did not find sufficient evidence that Rutledge intended to defraud Smith when the settlement was made.
  3. Fraudulent Transfer: The court found that the asset transfer from CGH to RIC was a fraudulent conveyance under Alberta’s Fraudulent Preferences Act.
  4. Remedies: The court declared CGH’s assets transferred to RIC available for Smith to enforce the judgment. However, Rutledge was not held personally liable.

Conclusion: Smith can pursue CGH’s assets to satisfy the remaining $68,000 judgment.

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2308 00161
Corporate & commercial law
$ 68,000
Plaintiff