·  Core Issue:

• Woodhaven sued the MD and Palmer, alleging misrepresentations, trespass, and water diversion related to negotiations over subdivision approval for the Ardmore Lands in Bonnyville, Alberta.

·  Key Facts:

• In 2011, Woodhaven applied for subdivision of the Ardmore Lands. Approval was granted with conditions, including a development agreement and stormwater plan.
• After years of unsuccessful negotiations, the MD refused to extend the subdivision approval in 2016, leading to Woodhaven filing the lawsuit in 2018.
• Woodhaven claimed that Palmer and the MD were responsible for misrepresentations, misfeasance in public office, and trespass, among other wrongdoings.

·  Court’s Decision:

• The court granted the MD and Palmer’s request for summary dismissal of the claims.

·  Key Legal Findings:

• No Binding Contract: The court found no evidence of a binding development agreement between Woodhaven and the MD.
• No Actionable Misrepresentation: Woodhaven failed to prove Palmer made false representations. Even if statements were made, they were deemed statements of future intention and not actionable.
• Negligence Claim Dismissed: The court ruled that the MD's actions during negotiations were policy decisions, granting them immunity from negligence claims.
• No Trespass or Water Diversion Liability: The court found no evidence of trespass or unlawful water diversion by the MD, and claims were barred by limitations.

·  Conclusion: All claims against the MD and Palmer were dismissed. No monetary award was specfied.