Merchant Law Group LLP v Bank of Montreal
Merchant Law Group LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Merchant Law Group LLP
Bank of Montreal
Law Firm / Organization
Field LLP
Lawyer(s)

Lindsey E. Miller

Merchant Law Professional Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Merchant Law Group LLP
Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Alberta
Law Firm / Organization
Alberta Justice
Lawyer(s)

Lisa Friesenhan

·  Background:

  • Alberta issued a "Requirement to Pay" (RTP) related to a tax debt owed by Merchant Law Professional Corporation.
  • The Bank of Montreal froze funds in Merchant Law Group LLP’s account, not knowing whether they could be used to pay the debt.
  • BMO sought an interpleader order to resolve the competing claims to the funds, and the court allowed it to deposit the $80,000 in dispute into the court.
  • Merchant Law Group LLP unsuccessfully appealed this decision.

·  Key Issues:

  • The allocation of costs after the unsuccessful appeal and related proceedings.
  • Alberta argued that no costs should be awarded because the issue was novel under Alberta’s tax laws.

·  Ruling:

  • The court found that BMO was entitled to costs as it acted reasonably by seeking interpleader relief.
  • Alberta and Merchant Law Group LLP were held jointly and severally liable for the costs incurred by BMO, as they continued litigation unnecessarily after the funds were deposited.
  • Merchant Law Group LLP, though unsuccessful in the appeal, was awarded costs for its successful claim to the disputed funds, with Alberta solely responsible for those costs.

·  Costs:

  • BMO: Awarded $27,300 in costs, shared equally by Alberta and Merchant Law Group LLP. Additionally, $787.97 in disbursements
  • Merchant Law Group LLP: Awarded $16,500 in costs, payable by Alberta alone.
  • There were no damages awarded in this case; the focus was on the allocation of costs. Therefore, the total monetary award for costs and disbursements was $44,587.97.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1903 02342
Banking/Finance
$ 44,588
Defendant