Roach v. Nordic Ins. Co. of Canada
Neil James Roach
Law Firm / Organization
MacGillivray Injury and Insurance Law
Lawyer(s)

Taylan Caliskan

The Nordic Insurance Company of Canada
Law Firm / Organization
Intact Financial Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Guy Harfouche

Facts:

  • Mr. Roach, a licensed practical nurse, was injured in 2004 and received Extended Earnings Replacement Benefits (EERB) from the Workers’ Compensation Board.
  • In 2015, while working as a cab driver, he was injured in a car accident and sought Section B benefits under his auto insurance policy.
  • Nordic Insurance denied these benefits, arguing that his EERB payments should be offset against the Section B benefits.

Legal Issue:

  • Should EERB benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act be deducted from weekly loss of income benefits under Section B of the Automobile Insurance Contract Mandatory Conditions Regulations?

Decision:

  • The court ruled that EERB benefits are deductible from Section B benefits as they are considered "payments for loss of income from employment."
  • The court relied on the binding precedent of McLean v. Portage la Prairie Mutual Insurance Co., which reached a similar conclusion.
  • Even if McLean was not binding, the court would still find the same legislative interpretation.

Conclusion:

  • Mr. Roach's request to receive Section B benefits without deduction of his EERB payments was denied, affirming that such payments are deductible under the current legal framework. No monetary award was specified in the decision.
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
482484
Insurance law
Defendant