Mehedi v. Tamlin
MD. GOLAM SARWAR MEHEDI
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
ELAINE TAMLIN, INSTRUCTOR
Law Firm / Organization
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG)
Lawyer(s)

Christine Kucey

CHRISTINE EDDY, CHAIR, LEARNING, AND DISTANCE PROGRAM, CENTENNIAL COLLEGE
Law Firm / Organization
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG)
Lawyer(s)

Christine Kucey

STEPHEN DANSO, COORDINATOR, DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAM, CENTENNIAL COLLEGE
Law Firm / Organization
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG)
Lawyer(s)

Christine Kucey

CENTENNIAL COLLEGE
Law Firm / Organization
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG)
Lawyer(s)

Christine Kucey

·  Background:

  • The plaintiff, a student at Centennial College, failed a course and initiated a lawsuit instead of appealing his grade.
  • Settlement discussions occurred, leading to an agreement where the defendants would pay the plaintiff $4,000.

·  Legal Issues:

  1. Existence of a Settlement Agreement:
    • The court determined that a valid settlement agreement existed as both parties agreed to all essential terms, including the payment amount and the dismissal of the claim.
  2. Enforcement of Settlement:
    • The plaintiff tried to contest the settlement post-agreement, claiming additional costs and arguing he was under duress.
    • The court found no evidence of duress or unfair circumstances that would justify setting aside the settlement.

·  Decision:

  • The motion to enforce the settlement was granted. The plaintiff’s claim was dismissed.
  • The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendants’ costs fixed at $4,000.

·  Key Points:

  • There is a strong presumption in favor of the finality of settlements.
  • The plaintiff’s post-settlement request for additional compensation was not supported by evidence of coercion or mistake.
  • Settlements are critical to the civil litigation process and should be upheld to maintain judicial efficiency and fairness.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-686915-0000
Civil litigation
$ 4,000
Defendant