Overview
- Background: Sona Nanotech Inc. developed a COVID-19 antigen test using gold nanorod technology, seeking regulatory approval from the FDA and Health Canada.
- Plaintiff’s Claim: Pineo alleges Sona's Q3 2020 MD&A misrepresented the test’s validation data and regulatory compliance, influencing stock transactions.
- Legal Basis: Claims involve misrepresentation under s. 146C(1) of the Nova Scotia Securities Act, oppression under s. 241(2) of the CBCA, and breaches of directors' duties under s. 122(1) of the CBCA.
Key Allegations of Misrepresentation
- Independence of Clinical Study: Alleged SaudiVax study was not independent, with unreliable data.
- Failure to Comply with FDA Guidance: Study did not adhere to FDA protocols, particularly in not testing asymptomatic patients.
- Inaccurate Data Reporting: Claimed sensitivity and specificity rates were misleading; Health Canada found lower sensitivity.
Plaintiff’s Motions
- Leave to Proceed: Seeks court approval to continue under the Securities Act.
- Class Certification: Aims to certify a class action for affected investors from September 29 to November 30, 2020.
Defendants' Position:
- Deny allegations, asserting reliability of the data and that statements were not misleading.
Court’s Decision Framework
- The court must determine if there's a "reasonable possibility" of success and if the claim is made in good faith.
Outcome
- The court evaluates if the evidence justifies leave to proceed and class certification, focusing on the materiality of misrepresentations.
Successful Party & Damages
- The document does not specify a successful party or award any damages. It centers on preliminary rulings about proceeding to trial.