Chicago Title Insurance v. John Doe
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
JOHN DOE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
JANE DOE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
XUAN DIEU VY NGUYEN
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
2735046 ONTARIO INC. o/a LPR GLOBAL
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
CANG TRAN a.k.a. TRAN VAN CANG a.k.a. CANG V. TRAN a.k.a. CANG VAN TRAN
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
TENG CHUN CHIAO a.k.a TENG CHUN CHAO
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
THUY DOAN QUANG
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
NGUYEN HOANG DUY
Law Firm / Organization
Juzkiw Law Professional Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Stefan Juzkiw

ALBERT BAIRD
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
KERRY JAMES
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Overview:

  • This case involves a mortgage fraud scheme where several individuals and entities, including John Doe, Jane Doe, and Xuan Dieu Vy Nguyen (Defendants), allegedly misrepresented ownership of a Mississauga property to obtain a fraudulent loan and mortgage.

Key Facts:

  • A fraudulent mortgage led to a Tribunal Hearing, declaring it a "fraudulent instrument."

  • Chicago Title Insurance (Plaintiff) paid $620,500.13 under a Title Insurance Policy and traced the fraudulent funds to the Defendants' accounts.

Legal Proceedings:

  • An ex parte Mareva Injunction was issued on July 13, 2023, freezing the Defendants' accounts to prevent asset dissipation until the case concluded.

Court's Decision:

  • The court extended the Mareva Injunction, finding a strong prima facie case of fraud and a significant risk of asset dissipation in favor of the Plaintiff.

Key Judgment Points:

  • Fraud Evidence: Adequate evidence supported the fraud claims, including traced funds and Defendant statements.

  • Asset Dissipation Risk: The fraud indicated a high risk of asset removal or concealment.

  • Balance of Convenience: The injunction was necessary to prevent further loss and ensure potential recovery.

Further Actions:

  • The Plaintiff was authorized to seek a default judgment.

  • Defendant Xuan Dieu Vy Nguyen, self-represented, could give oral evidence due to language barriers.

Conclusion:

  • The court upheld the Mareva Injunction and took steps to ensure fairness, especially for self-represented parties.

  • Chicago Title Insurance Company was the successful party.

Monetary Award/Costs:

  • No specific damages were awarded beyond the $1,465,000 frozen under the Mareva Injunction, covering amounts held in the Defendants' accounts. The Plaintiff may seek further monetary awards through default judgment.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-00683217-0000
Real estate
$ 1,465,000
Plaintiff