Ottawa Credit Exchange Limited v. Wu et al.
Ottawa Credit Exchange Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Rasmussen Starr Ruddy LLP
Lawyer(s)

Anthony J. Imbesi

David Wu
Law Firm / Organization
Lerners LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jason Squire

Opus Fitness Investment Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Lerners LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jason Squire

Key Legal Issue: OCEL sought the production of specific documents from the defendants, arguing they were relevant to a commercial dispute concerning a management buyout and reorganization of The Athletic Club (now Movati Athletic Inc.).

Documents Requested:

  1. Emails sent or received by David Wu using a specific email address.
  2. Blackberry Messenger (BBM) chats involving Mr. Wu.
  3. Emails between Mr. Wu and the law firm Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.
  4. Forensic data copies from smartphones and computers used by the defendants.

Defendants' Argument: The defendants argued that the documents requested were not in their possession, control, or power.

Court's Findings:

  • The court found no evidence that the defendants had the documents or that they were in a position to produce them.
  • The court concluded that the plaintiff's request did not meet the requirements under Rule 30.02(1) of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure.

Outcome: The motion was dismissed with costs awarded to the defendants. OCEL was ordered to pay $5,000 in costs to the defendants within 30 days.

Key Points:

  • The court emphasized that documents must be disclosed only if they are in the possession, control, or power of the party.
  • The plaintiff's failure to provide sufficient evidence led to the dismissal of the motion for document production.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
14-62684
Corporate & commercial law
$ 5,000
Defendant