Surefire Dividend Capture, LP v. National Liability & Fire Insurance Company (Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance)
Surefire Dividend Capture, LP
Law Firm / Organization
WeirFoulds LLP
National Liability & Fire Insurance Company c.o.b. as Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance
Law Firm / Organization
Lester & Associates
Lawyer(s)

Reid Lester

Arthur J. Gallagher Canada Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Lester & Associates
Lawyer(s)

Reid Lester

The Honourable Mark Falk (Ret.), in his capacity as U.S. Ancillary Receiver for Broad Reach Capital, LC
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gemma Healy-Murphy

Background:

  • SDC invested $31.2 million USD in BRC, a hedge fund.
  • The investment was lost due to a Ponzi scheme by Brenda Smith, BRC’s CEO, who was later convicted of securities fraud.
  • SDC sought indemnification from Berkshire under a fidelity bond for fraud-related losses.

Legal Issues:

  • Intervention: The Ancillary Receiver for BRC sought to intervene in the appeal to affirm BRC's status as an insured under the Bond, affecting its own claim against Berkshire.
  • Appeal: SDC appealed the trial court's interpretation, which found BRC, not SDC, was the insured entity eligible for claims.

Court Decision:

  • Intervention Granted: The court allowed the Ancillary Receiver to intervene, provided authorization from the U.S. Court is obtained.
  • Conditions: The Ancillary Receiver must file a factum by August 30, 2024, without introducing new evidence.
  • Proceedings: The intervention will not delay the appeal scheduled for September 9, 2024.

Key Points:

  • The appeal challenges the interpretation of insurance coverage under the Bond.
  • The court found the intervention necessary for presenting BRC’s perspective.
  • The appeal will determine whether SDC or BRC can claim under the Bond.

Successful Party:

  • The Ancillary Receiver, granted leave to intervene, is the successful party for this motion.

Monetary Award / Costs / Damages:

  • No specific monetary awards, costs, or damages were mentioned. The focus is on procedural matters.

 

Court of Appeal for Ontario
M55318; COA-23-CV-0891
Insurance law
Other