Pyper v. Goble
Trevor Goble
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Marie Pyper
Law Firm / Organization
Emond Harnden LLP
Onyx Community Services
Law Firm / Organization
Emond Harnden LLP

Background:

  • Trevor Goble appealed an order declaring him a vexatious litigant under section 140 of the Courts of Justice Act (CJA). This designation limits his ability to commence legal proceedings without permission.

Key Issues on Appeal:

  1. Credibility of Evidence: Goble argued that the motion judge erred in assessing the evidence and improperly favored the evidence of Marie Pyper over his own.
  2. Authority of Application: Goble contended that Pyper had no authority to initiate the s. 140 application on behalf of Onyx Community Services.
  3. Vexatious Litigation History: Goble asserted that there were no previously decided matters that could justify labeling him as a vexatious litigant.

Court's Decision:

  • Appeal Dismissed: The court rejected all of Goble’s arguments, affirming the motion judge’s decision.
  • Credibility Assessment: The motion judge correctly assessed the evidence, including Goble’s extensive history of vexatious litigation, and made no errors in her findings.
  • Authority to Act: The court confirmed that Pyper, as the Executive Director of Onyx, was authorized to bring the application, and the respondents' counsel acted with proper authority.
  • Costs Awarded: The appeal was deemed frivolous and vexatious. The court ordered Goble to pay the respondents’ costs on a substantial indemnity basis, totaling $24,103.41.

 

Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-23-CV-1062
Civil litigation
$ 24,103
Respondent