Jones v. Quinn
Elwood Andrew Quinn
Law Firm / Organization
Hummingbird Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Erik Savas

Linda Jones
Law Firm / Organization
Schmidt Law Legal Services
Lawyer(s)

Jason Schmidt

Philip Jones
Law Firm / Organization
Schmidt Law Legal Services
Lawyer(s)

Jason Schmidt

Background

  • 2017: Linda Jones transferred a 100-acre property to Elwood Andrew Quinn under an Agreement of Private Purchase and Sale (APPS) to alleviate financial difficulties.
  • Buyback Provision (BBP): Allowed Linda Jones to repurchase the property within eight years at a specified price.
  • Relationship Breakdown: Cooperation declined by late 2019, and Quinn's son-in-law, Hugh Franklin, aggressively moved to evict Linda Jones and her son.

Proceedings and Findings

  • 2019-2021: Efforts by Linda Jones to initiate the buyback were obstructed by Hugh Franklin.
  • March 24, 2021: Jones delivered an unconditional offer to purchase the property, which Franklin did not accept.
  • Applications: The court found Quinn breached the BBP and recognized a constructive trust over the property in favor of the Joneses.

Appeal Issues

  1. Option Contract: Whether the BBP was an option contract requiring strict compliance.
  2. Breach of BBP: Whether Quinn frustrated the respondents' exercise of the BBP.
  3. Specific Performance: The order compelling the sale of the property under the BBP.
  4. Return of Items: The order to return removed items and vehicles to their rightful owners.
  5. Costs Award: Quinn's appeal against the $50,000 costs award.

Court of Appeal Decision

  • BBP as Option: Affirmed as an option requiring good faith.
  • Frustration of BBP: Upheld Franklin's obstruction.
  • Specific Performance: Affirmed the order for the property transfer.
  • Return of Items: Quashed order for unspecified items, upheld vehicle return.
  • Costs Award: Denied appeal, maintaining $50,000 award to respondents.

 

Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-22-CV-0053
Real estate
$ 50,000
Respondent