One Clarendon Inc. v. Finlay
Kathleen Finlay
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
John Finlay also known as Richard Finlay and J.R. Finlay
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
One Clarendon Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Aird & Berlis LLP

Background:

  • The tenants (appellants) had significant rent arrears and refused to pay rent.
  • The landlord (respondent) initiated an action in the Superior Court, pending trial, and sought an interim order for the tenants to pay ongoing rent and arrears.
  • Justice William Black of the Superior Court granted the interim order.

Procedural History:

  • The tenants initially sought to appeal the interim order to the Divisional Court, later abandoning it and filing an appeal to the Court of Appeal.
  • The landlord moved to quash the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
  • The court adjourned the motion to quash but required the tenants to continue paying rent during the adjournment.
  • The tenants eventually abandoned their appeal.

Costs Decision:

  • The landlord requested costs for the motion to quash and the adjournment.
  • The Bill of Costs included calculations for full indemnity, substantial indemnity, and partial indemnity scales.
  • The Court of Appeal awarded the landlord partial indemnity costs, the standard practice, rejecting full indemnity despite tenants’ allegedly abusive conduct.
  • Costs Awarded: $9,045.66 inclusive of disbursements and HST, payable immediately by the tenants.

Conclusion:

  • The Court of Appeal determined that while the tenants’ actions might be considered abusive, this issue should be addressed in the Superior Court.
  • The landlord was granted partial indemnity costs.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-23-CV-0492; M54287
Civil litigation
$ 9,046
Respondent