Nature Ridge Homes Ltd. v. Faulkner
Nature Ridge Homes Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McInnes Cooper
Lawyer(s)

Noah Entwisle

Victoria Faulkner
Law Firm / Organization
Cox & Palmer
Lawyer(s)

Sarah Dobson

Christopher Faulkner
Law Firm / Organization
Cox & Palmer
Lawyer(s)

Sarah Dobson

Background:

  • Agreement: The Faulkners contracted Nature Ridge Homes Ltd. to build a house in Porter’s Lake for $599,000.
  • Issue: Rising lumber costs led to disputes over increased construction costs.
  • Small Claims Court: Ruled that the Faulkners overpaid due to duress, ordering repayment of certain overages.
  • Appeal: Nature Ridge Homes Ltd. appealed the decision.

Key Findings and Reasoning:

  1. Initial Contract:
    • Date: February 5, 2021.
    • Terms: Included provisions for cost overages but did not specify handling unforeseen inflation.
  2. Cost Overages:
    • Communication: The Faulkners were notified about potential lumber cost increases in April 2021.
    • Response: Faulkners chose to proceed with the additional costs rather than cancel the contract.
  3. Adjudicator’s Decision:
    • Findings: The increased costs were included in a later Schedule “E”, which the Faulkners signed under pressure due to lack of alternatives.
    • Conclusion: Found economic duress, ordered repayment of specific overages.
  4. Grounds for Appeal:
    • Economic Duress: Claimed it was applied incorrectly as a cause of action rather than a defense.
    • Contract Interpretation: Asserted that the original contract did not authorize additional charges for lumber without consent.
  5. Supreme Court Decision:
    • Error in Law: Found the Adjudicator misapplied evidence and legal principles.
    • No Choice: Determined the Faulkners had alternatives and had agreed to additional costs previously.
    • Contract Terms: Noted original awareness of rising costs, invalidating duress claim.

Outcome:

  • Appeal Allowed: The Adjudicator’s decision was quashed.
  • Order: Monies paid to the Faulkners to be returned, and the Appellant awarded costs. Excat total amount awarded was not specified.

 

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
524735
Civil litigation
Appellant