Langen v. Sharma
John LANGEN
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

J. Wong

Nancy LANGEN
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

J. Wong

Rajnish SHARMA
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

M. Klaiman

Veena SHARMA
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

M. Klaiman

Dispute:

  • A failed purchase and sale agreement for the Applicants' home at 4 McArthur Heights, Brampton.
  • Applicants sought $400,000 in damages (loss on resale), $25,319.69 in carrying costs, and forfeiture of a $100,000 deposit.

Claims and Defenses:

  • Applicants: Claimed breach of contract by the Respondents for failing to close.
  • Respondents: Argued they were entitled not to close due to innocent misrepresentation by the Applicants about municipal taxes and alleged bad faith by the Applicants.

Facts:

  • The purchase price was $2,900,000 with a $100,000 deposit.
  • Agreement amended to remove one buyer and extend closing to August 15, 2022.
  • The transaction failed; the property was resold at a $400,000 loss, with additional carrying costs incurred.

Key Legal Issues:

  • Innocent Misrepresentation: Respondents claimed misrepresentation on municipal taxes induced the contract.
  • Entire Agreement Clause: Applicants argued this clause excluded reliance on pre-contractual misrepresentations.
  • Good Faith Performance: Respondents claimed Applicants failed in their duty by not extending the closing date adequately.

Court Findings:

  • Entire Agreement Clause: The court ruled it excluded the misrepresentation claim regarding municipal taxes.
  • Good Faith Performance: The claim failed as the misrepresentation argument was invalid.

Decision:

  • The court awarded the Applicants $425,319.69 in damages and ordered forfeiture of the $100,000 deposit.
  • Both parties were to submit cost filings within specified timelines.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-00002388-0000
Real estate
$ 525,320
Applicant