Longair v. Akumin Inc. et al.
Terry Longair
Law Firm / Organization
Kalloghlian Myers LLP
Akumin Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel S. Murdoch

Riadh Zine-El-Abidine
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Mohammad Saleem
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Thomas Davies
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Stan Dunford
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Murray Lee
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
James Webb
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Ernst & Young LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Torys LLP

Legal Context:

  • Action: Plaintiff seeks a global class action under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act (OSA), alleging material misrepresentations in Akumin's public disclosures and financial statements.
  • Claims:
    • Secondary market misrepresentation (requires leave)
    • Primary market misrepresentation
    • Common law negligence (no leave required)

Akumin’s Background:

  • Business: Operates outpatient medical imaging clinics in the US.
  • Financial Transition: Moved from TSX to NASDAQ, adopting US GAAP in 2020.
  • Major Acquisition: Acquired Alliance HealthCare Services Inc. in 2021 for $820 million USD.

Key Events:

  1. August 15, 2021: Delay in Q2 2021 financial results due to potential credit losses.
  2. October 12, 2021: Announced errors in AR and PPE requiring restatements for FY 2019, 2020, and Q1 2021.
  3. November 8, 2021: Detailed $19 million PPE error.
  4. November 15, 2021: Released restated financial statements and Q2 2021 results.

Plaintiff's Allegations:

  • Overstated AR, revenue, PPE, and shareholders' equity.
  • Non-compliance with IFRS and US GAAP.
  • Ineffective internal controls.
  • Against EY: No basis for unqualified audit opinions and non-compliance with audit standards.

Court's Findings:

  • Expert Evidence: Admitted from both parties.
  • Materiality and Public Correction: Established reasonable possibility of success; corrections were made, resulting in share price declines.

Legal Principles:

  • Materiality: Objective and context-specific.
  • Public Correction: Must be understood as correcting misleading statements.
  • OSA Leave Test: Requires good faith and a reasonable possibility of success.

Conclusion:

Leave granted for the secondary market misrepresentation claim under the OSA; class action certified for all claims based on the evidence.

No monetary award specified.

 

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-21-00674081-00CP
Class actions
Plaintiff