Tieu v Layeghpour
Phuong Le Tieu
Law Firm / Organization
Verhaeghe Law Office
Lawyer(s)

Monica Wang

Shahin Layeghpour
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented

Background:

  • Conflict arose between Phuong Le Tieu (Applicant) and Shahin Layeghpour (Respondent) after Layeghpour began tenancy in Tieu's condo.
  • Layeghpour moved out on April 15, 2022, after an eviction notice.
  • Layeghpour filed a dispute with the Residential Tenancy Dispute Resolution Service (RTDRS), which ruled in his favor, ordering Tieu to pay $1,550.
  • The main issue was whether Tieu was properly served with court documents.

Issue:

  • Whether Tieu received actual service of the documents as claimed by Layeghpour.

Law:

  • Contempt requires clear orders, actual knowledge of the order, and intentional breach.
  • Alberta Evidence Act mandates proof of authenticity and integrity of electronic records.

Analysis:

  • Layeghpour’s affidavits and evidence (photo and audio clips) lacked credibility and metadata.
  • Tieu denied receiving documents and provided evidence of residing elsewhere.
  • Berzins, Tieu’s lawyer, corroborated Tieu’s claims, stating the photo was from April 15, not August 2.
  • The court noted inconsistencies in Layeghpour’s claims, including no registered mail or text message evidence.
  • Tieu’s limited English and the lack of communication supporting Layeghpour’s claims further supported her position.

Conclusion:

  • The court found Tieu had not been properly served, setting aside the contempt order against her.
  • It noted Layeghpour’s attempt to deceive the court, leading to Tieu’s wrongful arrest, and awarded Tieu her solicitor-client costs.

Order:

  • Contempt order against Tieu was set aside.
  • $1,000 paid into court by Tieu was to be released to her.
  • Tieu was awarded reasonable solicitor-client costs.

 

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2203 11754
Civil litigation
$ 1,000
Applicant