27 Jun 2024
Tieu v Layeghpour
Background:
- Conflict arose between Phuong Le Tieu (Applicant) and Shahin Layeghpour (Respondent) after Layeghpour began tenancy in Tieu's condo.
- Layeghpour moved out on April 15, 2022, after an eviction notice.
- Layeghpour filed a dispute with the Residential Tenancy Dispute Resolution Service (RTDRS), which ruled in his favor, ordering Tieu to pay $1,550.
- The main issue was whether Tieu was properly served with court documents.
Issue:
- Whether Tieu received actual service of the documents as claimed by Layeghpour.
Law:
- Contempt requires clear orders, actual knowledge of the order, and intentional breach.
- Alberta Evidence Act mandates proof of authenticity and integrity of electronic records.
Analysis:
- Layeghpour’s affidavits and evidence (photo and audio clips) lacked credibility and metadata.
- Tieu denied receiving documents and provided evidence of residing elsewhere.
- Berzins, Tieu’s lawyer, corroborated Tieu’s claims, stating the photo was from April 15, not August 2.
- The court noted inconsistencies in Layeghpour’s claims, including no registered mail or text message evidence.
- Tieu’s limited English and the lack of communication supporting Layeghpour’s claims further supported her position.
Conclusion:
- The court found Tieu had not been properly served, setting aside the contempt order against her.
- It noted Layeghpour’s attempt to deceive the court, leading to Tieu’s wrongful arrest, and awarded Tieu her solicitor-client costs.
Order:
- Contempt order against Tieu was set aside.
- $1,000 paid into court by Tieu was to be released to her.
- Tieu was awarded reasonable solicitor-client costs.
Court
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
Practice Area
Civil litigation