Murphy v. GMCC
Marilyn Murphy
Law Firm / Organization
Carter Simpson
General Motors of Canada Company
Law Firm / Organization
McInnes Cooper
Lawyer(s)

Ian Dunbar

Background:

  • Incident: Single motor vehicle collision on March 9, 2018.
  • Injuries: Plaintiff sustained injuries from airbag deployment.
  • Initial Legal Action: Notice of Action and Statement of Claim filed on March 9, 2020, but not served within the required one-year period.

Motion:

  • Plaintiff's Request: Renew the expired Notice of Action and Statement of Claim.
  • Defendant's Argument: Opposed the motion, citing the passage of five years since the incident, which would unfairly extend the limitation period.

Legal Issues:

  • Whether the Motion to Renew should be granted given the delays and potential prejudice to both parties.

Key Legal Points:

  • Rule 4.04(5): Allows for renewal of a Notice of Action if not served within a year.
  • Inadvertence: The plaintiff’s solicitor’s failure to serve the action was due to inadvertence, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Prejudice:
    • Plaintiff: Would suffer serious prejudice if the claim is not renewed, losing the right to seek compensation.
    • Defendant: Claims prejudice due to the delay but cannot demonstrate prejudice that cannot be compensated by costs.

Court's Analysis:

  • Burden of Proof: Plaintiff must show serious prejudice from non-renewal and that the defendant will not suffer irremediable prejudice.
  • Exceptional Circumstances: Recognized the impact of COVID-19 on legal practice and the inadvertence of the plaintiff's solicitor.
  • Balancing Prejudice: Determined that denying renewal would result in greater prejudice to the plaintiff compared to the defendant.

Decision:

  • The Court granted the Motion to Renew the Notice of Action and Statement of Claim without costs.
  • The decision document does not specify a monetary award.

 

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
497285
Civil litigation
Plaintiff