Bank of Montreal v 2093924 Ontario Inc
Bank of Montreal
Law Firm / Organization
Dentons Canada LLP
2093924 Ontario Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Sharek Logan & Van Leenan LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Archibold

Hyeong Sik Kim
Law Firm / Organization
Sharek Logan & Van Leenan LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Archibold

Hee Seon Kim
Law Firm / Organization
Sharek Logan & Van Leenan LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Archibold

MNP Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Klair Group Industries Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Doherty Schuldhaus LLP
Lawyer(s)

Brian G. Doherty

1643434 Alberta Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Rock-N-Wash®
Lawyer(s)

Sylvain Blouin

Key Points:

  • Case Nature:
    • MNP Ltd. was appointed as Receiver of 2093924 Ontario Inc. (“209”).
    • The Receiver sought court approval for an Amended Asset and Real Estate Purchase Agreement (APA) to sell 209’s assets to Klair Group Industries Ltd. (“Klair”).
    • 209 operates the "Wash Factory" truck wash.
  • Patent Dispute:
    • 1643434 Alberta Ltd. (“164”) opposed the sale, citing a patent on the facility’s "3 Door Car Wash Design."
    • The Receiver argued that 164’s patent rights were exhausted when the facility was sold to 209 in 2016.
  • Court's Findings:
    • Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion: Once a patented item is sold, the patentee’s control over that item ends. The court found 164’s patent rights were exhausted in the 2016 sale to 209.
    • Sale Process: The Receiver’s efforts to market the facility were sufficient, and the APA terms were fair and reasonable.
  • Decision:
    • The APA was approved.
    • The Wash Factory sale to Klair was allowed without restrictions from 164’s patent.
    • Ancillary relief requested by the Receiver was granted, including approval of their activities and deeming certain notices sufficient.
  • The document did not specify the exact total monetary award

 

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2303 22127
Intellectual property
Other