Fares Construction Limited v. Lead Structural Formwork Limited
Fares Construction Limited
Law Firm / Organization
McInnes Cooper
W. M. Fares Family Incorporated
Law Firm / Organization
McInnes Cooper
Lead Structural Formwork Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Ritch Williams & Richards
Lawyer(s)

Wayne Francis

W. M. Fares Architects Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Grove US LLC
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Rachel Cooper

Rapicon Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Rapicon Tower Crane West Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
APA Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
BMR Structural Engineering Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Forgeron Engineering Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Passmore Inspection & Consulting Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Cherubini Group Of Companies
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Cherubini Metal Works
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Incident

  • Event: Collapse of a tower crane during Hurricane Dorian on September 7, 2019.
  • Location: Construction project in Halifax, Nova Scotia, for a 17-story residential building, Brenton Suites.

Legal Actions

  • Motion: Plaintiffs sought summary judgment against Lead Structural Formwork Limited.
  • Claims: Plaintiffs allege breach of contract and negligence by Lead, responsible for crane's collapse.
  • Evidence Presented:
    • Plaintiffs: Affidavit from Maurice Fares and Zana Fares-Choueri.
    • Defendant: Affidavit and cross-examination of David Pottier, President of Lead.

Court's Findings

  1. Premature Motion: Discovery on liability issues not yet complete.
  2. Genuine Issue of Material Fact: Cause of the crane collapse remains unresolved.
  3. Complexity and Interconnected Actions: Multiple related actions involving numerous parties, risking inconsistent findings if summary judgment were granted.

Decision

  • Outcome: Motion for summary judgment dismissed.
  • Reasoning:
    • Plaintiffs failed to provide conclusive evidence on the crane's cause of collapse.
    • The issues are too complex and interconnected with other ongoing legal actions to resolve via summary judgment.
    • Importance of determining the exact cause of the collapse before assigning liability.

Key Points

  • Test for Summary Judgment: Governed by Civil Procedure Rule 13.04.
  • Material Fact: Essential to prove the cause of the crane collapse to establish breach of contract or negligence.
  • Interest of Justice: Avoid partial summary judgments in complex, interrelated cases to prevent inconsistent rulings.

Conclusion

  • The motion was dismissed, emphasizing the need for a full trial to resolve the material factual disputes and interconnected liability issues comprehensively.
  • The document did not indicate any monetary award.
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
503819
Construction law
Defendant