Canada Post Corporation v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers
Canada Post Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Cox & Palmer
Lawyer(s)

Geoffrey Breen

Canadian Union of Postal Workers
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin

Background:

  • Employee: Mary Jayne Sauson, injured in February 2010.
  • Injury: Shoulder injury, began receiving Workers' Compensation in April 2011, secured a new position in December 2014.
  • Grievance: Alleged breach of duty to accommodate during the interim period.

Arbitrator’s Decision:

  • Date: April 21, 2023
  • Arbitrator: Susan Ashley
  • Outcome: Compensation for Sauson for loss of wages and damages under the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA).

Facts:

  • Sauson was injured lifting a parcel, continued working until April 2011.
  • Applied for accommodation in February 2013.
  • Canada Post searched for suitable positions from May 2012.
  • Sauson secured a new position on her initiative in December 2014.

Grievance Details:

  • Filed on May 22, 2013, claiming failure to accommodate.
  • Highlighted a “YB position” suitable for Sauson, not offered in 2012/2013.

Arbitrator’s Findings:

  • Failure to Accommodate: Not all appropriate positions identified or offered.
  • Compensation Start Date: Arbitrarily chosen as July 1, 2012.
  • Damages Awarded: Including wage loss, benefits arrears, and $12,000 under CHRA.

Judicial Review Application:

  • Applicant’s Grounds for Review: Arbitrator lacked jurisdiction, errors in accommodation determination, YB position placement, and damage particulars.
  • Court’s Analysis: Found concurrent jurisdiction, decision reasonable despite omission of 2012 back injury, likely $12,000 under CHRA for pain and suffering.

Outcome:

  • Judicial Review Dismissed: Decision reasonable and within jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
524200
Employment law
$ 12,000
Respondent