16 Jan 2024
Canada Post Corporation v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers
Background:
- Employee: Mary Jayne Sauson, injured in February 2010.
- Injury: Shoulder injury, began receiving Workers' Compensation in April 2011, secured a new position in December 2014.
- Grievance: Alleged breach of duty to accommodate during the interim period.
Arbitrator’s Decision:
- Date: April 21, 2023
- Arbitrator: Susan Ashley
- Outcome: Compensation for Sauson for loss of wages and damages under the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA).
Facts:
- Sauson was injured lifting a parcel, continued working until April 2011.
- Applied for accommodation in February 2013.
- Canada Post searched for suitable positions from May 2012.
- Sauson secured a new position on her initiative in December 2014.
Grievance Details:
- Filed on May 22, 2013, claiming failure to accommodate.
- Highlighted a “YB position” suitable for Sauson, not offered in 2012/2013.
Arbitrator’s Findings:
- Failure to Accommodate: Not all appropriate positions identified or offered.
- Compensation Start Date: Arbitrarily chosen as July 1, 2012.
- Damages Awarded: Including wage loss, benefits arrears, and $12,000 under CHRA.
Judicial Review Application:
- Applicant’s Grounds for Review: Arbitrator lacked jurisdiction, errors in accommodation determination, YB position placement, and damage particulars.
- Court’s Analysis: Found concurrent jurisdiction, decision reasonable despite omission of 2012 back injury, likely $12,000 under CHRA for pain and suffering.
Outcome:
- Judicial Review Dismissed: Decision reasonable and within jurisdiction.