SWS Marketing Inc. v. 1125003 B.C. Ltd.
SWS Marketing Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Murphy Battista LLP
Lawyer(s)

Derek M. Palaschuk

Rene Gauthier
Law Firm / Organization
Murphy Battista LLP
Lawyer(s)

Derek M. Palaschuk

1125003 BC Ltd. (dba Home Buyers Group)
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Grewal

Marijana Harasemljuk Zavier
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Grewal

Andrew Rezmer
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Grewal

Christian Saxvik
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Grewal

Odin Zavier
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Grewal

Background: The case arose from a dispute among investors in a real estate project in Vernon, British Columbia. SWS Marketing Inc. and Rene Gauthier (Appellants) appealed an order striking their notice of civil claim as an abuse of process. The project involved marketing and managing residential strata lots.

Legal Arguments/Issues:

  • The appellants contended that the chambers judge misapplied the doctrine of cause of action estoppel and erred in finding their action unnecessary, scandalous, frivolous, or vexatious.
  • The appellants argued the judge failed to recite the relevant legal threshold and improperly struck the action as an abuse of process.
  • The respondents, 1125003 B.C. Ltd. (doing business as Home Buyers Group), Marijana Harasemljuk Zavier, Andrew Rezmer, Christian Saxvik, and Odin Zavier, argued the appellants’ claims duplicated those in an earlier action (the "229 Action").

Court’s Decision:

  • The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower court’s decision to strike the pleadings under Rule 9-5(1) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules as an abuse of process.
  • The court found the claims in the 806 Action were nearly identical to those in the 229 Action, involving the same facts, evidence, and relief sought.
  • The judge did not misapply cause of action estoppel but struck the claim solely on the basis of abuse of process.

Costs/Award: The document did not specify the total amount of costs or any award in favor of the successful party, as the focus was on procedural dismissal rather than financial judgment.

Court of Appeals for British Columbia
CA48778
Real estate
Respondent