1731271 Alberta Inc v Reimer
1731271 Alberta Inc operating as Imperial Printing
Law Firm / Organization
Stephens Mah Toogood (SMT Legal)
Lawyer(s)

Roger C. Stephens

Angie Reimer
Law Firm / Organization
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Westkey Graphics Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP

Key Points:

  • Nature of Case:
    • Imperial Printing sought an interlocutory injunction against former employee Angie Reimer and her current employer Westkey Graphics Ltd.
    • Alleged breach of fiduciary duty and misappropriation of property.
  • Imperial Printing’s Claims:
    • Ms. Reimer, a key employee (fiduciary), allegedly enticed customers to Westkey, causing financial losses.
    • Sought to prevent Ms. Reimer and Westkey from soliciting its clients for one year.
    • Claimed Ms. Reimer took client-related property for Westkey’s benefit.
  • Respondents' Defense:
    • Ms. Reimer was not a fiduciary and did not breach any duty.
    • Any losses were not due to Ms. Reimer’s actions and could be compensated by damages.
    • Ms. Reimer provided an explanation for possessing the PCL material.
  • Court’s Analysis:
    • Existence of Fiduciary Duty:
      • Ms. Reimer’s role did not meet fiduciary criteria as she lacked independent authority or discretion over business operations.
      • Being a valuable employee does not establish fiduciary status.
    • Alleged Breach:
      • No strong prima facie case of improper client solicitation.
      • Emails notifying former clients of her new job did not constitute solicitation.
      • Evidence did not support claims of misappropriation or misuse of confidential information.
    • Irreparable Harm:
      • Imperial Printing failed to show irreparable harm that could not be compensated by damages.
    • Balance of Convenience:
      • Favored the respondents as preventing customer choice is not in the public interest.
      • Imperial Printing’s case was weak regarding fiduciary duty breach.
  • Result:
    • Application for an interlocutory injunction was dismissed.
    • No monetary awards or costs ordered.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2403 09977
Employment law
Respondent