Aubin v Condominium Plan No 862 2917
Mary Jean Aubin
Law Firm / Organization
Reynolds Mirth Richards & Farmer LLP
Lawyer(s)

Heidi Besuijen

The Owners: Condominium Plan 862 2917
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP

Background

  • Dispute over noise from a common area lounge affecting Aubin’s unit.
  • Initial ruling favored Aubin, requiring the Corporation to improve wall soundproofing.
  • Corporation’s compliance revealed construction issues, including asbestos.

Positions

  • Corporation: Sought $95,803 (50% legal indemnity) or Schedule C costs with a multiplier of three.
  • Aubin: Argued costs claim lacked evidence and should be limited to the appeal and one court appearance.

Legal Framework

  • Rules: Costs awarded to the successful party (r 10.29), with court discretion (r 10.31). Factors include result, success degree, claim amount, issue importance, complexity, and party conduct (r 10.33).
  • Case Law: McAllister v Calgary allows lump sum costs; costs must be proportionate and not oppressive.

Decision

  • Indemnification Costs: Rejected as disproportionate and unsupported by evidence.
  • Schedule C Costs: Appropriate due to low monetary stakes and straightforward issue. Multiplier applied due to Corporation's reasonable but refused remediation offer.

Conclusion

  • Award: Costs under Schedule C, Column 1, multiplied by 1.5 for the appeal. No multiplier for other steps. The document does not specify an exact total amount awarded.
  • Next Step: Assessment Officer to review the Bill of Costs for disputes.

 

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1903 00548
Real estate
Respondent