Walczak v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Sylwester Walczak and Regal Homes Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Canadian Imperial Banck of Commerce - Toronto
Law Firm / Organization
Bennett Jones LLP
Lawyer(s)

Denise Brunsdon

Ontario and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce - Calgary, Alberta
Law Firm / Organization
Bennett Jones LLP
Lawyer(s)

Denise Brunsdon

Background

  • Incident: On July 26, 2012, Sylwester Walczak’s business partner altered a cheque and deposited it into a controlled account at CIBC.
  • Claim: Walczak filed a claim on November 17, 2022, against CIBC for repayment and damages, discovering the fraud in 2021.
  • Initial Ruling: Applications Judge Prowse granted summary judgment to CIBC on April 19, 2023, ruling the claim was statute-barred under section 3(1)(b) of the Limitations Act.

Key Issues

  1. Statute of Limitations: Whether Walczak’s action was barred by the ten-year limitation period under section 3(1)(b) of the Limitations Act.
  2. Fraudulent Concealment Exception: Whether section 4(1) of the Act, which suspends the limitation period due to fraudulent concealment, applied.

Legal Analysis

  • Statute of Limitations: The limitation period begins when the wrongful act occurs, not when discovered. The ten-year period expired on October 10, 2022. Walczak’s claim was filed after this period.
  • Fraudulent Concealment: Requires active concealment. CIBC did not alter the cheque or conceal the fraud and was unaware until informed in 2021. Section 4(1) does not apply.

Decision

  • Appeal Dismissed: The appeal was dismissed, upholding that the claim was statute-barred.
  • Costs: Respondents were awarded $1,600, to be paid by October 1, 2024.

Despite discovering the fraud in 2021, the law mandates the ten-year period starts from the date of the wrongful act, and fraudulent concealment was not proven.

 

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2201 13423
Civil litigation
$ 1,600
Respondent