Li Yang v. LYSR Management
LI YANG (CANADA) HOLDINGS CO. LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Poon & Ho LLP
Lawyer(s)

Ford W. Wong

DANIEL EXECUTIVE (CANADA) HOLDINGS CORP.
Law Firm / Organization
Poon & Ho LLP
Lawyer(s)

Ford W. Wong

LYSR MANAGEMENT LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2708042 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
RINA SHINCHI
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
YANGGUANG LIN
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ZI MU LI
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
RENXIANGYU ZHANG
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
LOCATION WAY INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
WEI ZHENG
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
JOHN DOE
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
JANE DOE
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
OTHER PERSONS UNKNOWN WHO HAVE CONSPIRED WITH THE NAMED DEFENDANTS
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

Background

  • The case involves the Plaintiffs financing luxury vehicle purchases, alleging fraud and misconduct by the Defendants.
  • A Mareva injunction was issued on May 1, 2023, to prevent asset dissipation by the Defendants.

Key Findings and Orders

  1. Contempt of Court:
    • Defendant Yangguang Lin (Sony Lin) was held in contempt for non-compliance with court orders, including failing to provide vehicle financing information and attend court.
    • Lin was sentenced to 30 days in jail and barred from participating further in the case until costs were paid.
  2. Default Judgment:
    • A default judgment was granted against the Lin Defendants, including Yangguang Lin, for failing to defend themselves, awarding the Plaintiffs over $4,000,000.
  3. Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Conspiracy:
    • The Lin Defendants were found guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy by misrepresenting vehicle ownership and securing loans with false claims.
    • Plaintiffs were deceived into funding based on these false documents.
  4. Costs and Indemnity:
    • The court awarded substantial indemnity costs to the Plaintiffs due to the Defendants' contemptuous conduct.
  5. Mareva Injunction:
    • The Mareva injunction was vacated after the default judgment, having preserved assets during the litigation.

Monetary Awards

  • Damages: Over $4,000,000 for breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, and conspiracy.
  • Costs: Totaling approximately $219,790, with additional post-judgment interest ranging from 5.3% to 7%.

Conclusion The Plaintiffs succeeded, securing over $4,000,000 in damages and around $219,790 in costs and disbursements, plus interest.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-00687209-0000
Corporate & commercial law
$ 4,219,790
Plaintiff