Parkland Corporation v. 2615669 Ontario Inc.
Parkland Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Lawyer(s)

Brendan Jones

2615669 Ontario Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart Esten LLP
Lawyer(s)

William Leslie

Himadri Bhardwaj
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart Esten LLP
Lawyer(s)

William Leslie

Gagan Dadiala
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart Esten LLP
Lawyer(s)

William Leslie

Surinderpal Cheema
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart Esten LLP
Lawyer(s)

William Leslie

Rajinder Kalsi
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart Esten LLP
Lawyer(s)

William Leslie

Background:

  • Parkland Corporation supplies fuel to gas stations, including Pioneer stations.
  • In 2018, Parkland and the Dealer entered into an exclusive supply agreement for ten years, extendable for five more years.
  • The Dealer began selling fuel from another supplier on May 7, 2024, violating the agreement.

Court Decision:

  • Injunction Granted: Parkland's request for an interlocutory injunction was approved.
  • Test for Injunction:
    • Serious Issue: Parkland's case is substantial and not frivolous.
    • Irreparable Harm: Breach of the exclusive supply agreement presumes irreparable harm.
    • Balance of Convenience: Favors Parkland as enforcing the contract causes less harm to the Dealer than non-enforcement would to Parkland.

Key Findings:

  • Parkland showed a strong prima facie case of the Dealer's breach by selling non-Parkland fuel.
  • Alleged oral agreements to change commission rates were unsupported by evidence.
  • Dealer's financial troubles and lack of independent legal advice were irrelevant to the breach.
  • Parkland would suffer significant harm, including loss of control and reputational damage, without the injunction.

Costs:

  • Costs of the motion are reserved to be decided at trial.

Conclusion: The injunction preserves Parkland’s contractual rights and business interests pending the final application determination.

 

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-00720470-0000
Corporate & commercial law
Applicant