28 Jun 2024
Royal Bank of Canada v. Greb Tele-Data Inc. et al.
- Claims:
- RBC sued for repayment of corporate debts guaranteed by the Woodrows.
- Woodrows sought indemnification from Ross E. Greb and others.
Key Facts
- Background:
- Robert B. Woodrow and Ross E. Greb were directors and shareholders of Greb Tele-Data Inc.
- Anne Woodrow also guaranteed the company’s debts.
- Ross E. Greb filed a Consumer Proposal in May 2013 due to business failure.
- RBC filed a lawsuit in May 2014.
- Woodrows obtained a default judgment against third parties in February 2016.
Legal Issues
- Default Judgment:
- Included claims of fraud and misappropriation against Ross E. Greb.
- Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act:
- Woodrows sought to declare the default judgment survives Ross E. Greb's discharge under section 178(1)(d).
Court's Analysis and Decision
- Fraud and Fiduciary Duty:
- Section 178(1)(d) requires proof of debt from fraud while acting in a fiduciary capacity.
- Insufficient evidence to show Ross E. Greb owed a fiduciary duty to Robert Woodrow.
- Judgments should be read in entirety; “Third Parties” includes Ross E. Greb.
Conclusion
- The motion to declare the default judgment surviving the consumer proposal was dismissed.
- Woodrows must vacate the Writ of Seizure and Sale against Ross E. Greb.
Next Steps
- Written submissions on costs to be filed by July 22, 2024.