Whalen v Callihoo, 2050787 Alberta Ltd, Kreutzer, Kreutzer and Bates
Samantha Whalen
Law Firm / Organization
Bailey Wadden & Duffy LLP
Lawyer(s)

Evan C. Duffy

Bradley Callihoo
2050787 Alberta Ltd.
Ronald Alfred Kreutzer
Ronald Allen Kreutzer
Byron Bates

Background:

  • Plaintiff's Position:
    • Samantha Whalen, a councillor of the Fort McMurray 458 First Nation (FMFN), uncovered financial irregularities involving a $600,000 payment to defendant Bradley Callihoo through his company.
    • Following her discovery and confrontation with Mr. Callihoo, she filed a lawsuit in August 2018 alleging various financial improprieties.
  • Defendants' Position:
    • Defendants sought dismissal of the case due to a long delay under Alberta Rule of Court 4.33(2), which mandates dismissal if no significant action occurs within three years.

Legal Issues:

  • Primary Issue: Whether the lawsuit should be dismissed for long delay under rule 4.33(2).

Analysis:

  • Rule 4.33 Principles:
    • Requires dismissal if no significant advance in action within three years.
    • Period does not include the time between service of Statement of Claim and Statement of Defence.
    • Actions in related cases can be considered if they are inextricably linked.
  • Settlement Discussions:
    • Settlement discussions and resolutions related to Christmas bonuses and severance payments advanced the case.
    • Such negotiations can constitute a significant advance if they narrow issues or reflect agreement on aspects of the dispute.

Court's Findings:

  • Significant Advances:
    • Settlement discussions and resolutions concerning Christmas bonuses and severance payments were significant advances in the litigation.
    • Emails showing agreement on discontinuing the action and reimbursement of legal costs demonstrated progress.
  • Decision on Related Actions:
    • The court found that advances in related actions (Injunction Action and Judicial Review Proceedings) did not significantly advance the current action as they were not inextricably linked.

Conclusion:

  • The application to dismiss the action for long delay was denied.
  • Parties were ordered to attempt to agree on procedural orders within 30 days, or appear in Chambers to resolve outstanding issues.
  • No costs specified for this specific application.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1813 00600
Civil litigation
Plaintiff