RH20 North America Inc. v. Bergmann
RH20 North America Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
Unit Precast (Breslau) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
Martin Friedrich Bergmann
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Martin Friedrich Bergmann carrying on business as Martin Bergmann Umwelttechnik
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Bergmann Umwelttechnik GmbH
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Bergmann Beton + Abwassertechnik GmbH
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Bergmann GmbH
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Bergmann AG
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Bergmann North America Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Click+Clean GmbH
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lars Bergmann
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Michael John MacCormack
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
LeRoy Harvey Robinson
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Carlos Felipe Araque Parra
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP

RH20 North America Inc. and Unit Precast (Breslau) Ltd. (plaintiffs/appellants) appealed a Superior Court decision that struck out Unit Precast’s claims without leave to amend and dismissed Click’s stay motion. Martin Friedrich Bergmann, Bergmann-related entities, and individuals (defendants/respondents) cross-appealed, seeking to stay the action and refer the matter to arbitration.

Court of Appeal Decision:

  • Unit Precast’s Appeal: Dismissed

    • Reasons:
      • Unit Precast’s business was not shown to be part of RH20’s business in the claim.
      • No error in striking out claims against Lars Bergmann or the claim for intentional interference.
      • Conspiracy claim lacked specific allegations against Unit Precast.
      • Leave to amend denied as further facts were unlikely to improve Unit Precast’s position.
  • Click’s Cross-Appeal: Dismissed

    • Reasons:
      • Click waived its right to arbitrate by joining the motion to strike, rendering the arbitration agreement inoperative.
      • Seeking substantive relief from the court violated the obligation not to litigate disputes subject to arbitration.

Disposition:

  • Appeals by Unit Precast and Click dismissed. No costs were ordered for the appeal and cross-appeal.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-23-CV-0550
Corporate & commercial law
Defendant