Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Conejero
Scotia Mortgage Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Duncan Craig LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gil Miciak

Norhel Moreno Conejero
Law Firm / Organization
Schnell Hardy Jones LLP

Case Overview:

  • Nature of Case: Determination of priority to proceeds following the judicial sale of an encumbered property.
  • Property: Residential condominium unit in Red Deer owned by the defendant, Norhel Moreno Conejero.
  • Mortgage Default: Defendant defaulted on the mortgage registered to Scotia Mortgage Corporation.

Legal Proceedings:

  • Foreclosure: Foreclosure proceedings resulted in an Order Confirming Sale and Vesting Title on October 31, 2023.
  • Caveats: Three caveats registered by Condominium Corporation 9720481, focusing on one registered on May 27, 2023, for unpaid contributions (condo fees) since May 2018.

Main Legal Issue:

  • Dispute: Whether the Condominium Corporation can maintain the registration of the May Caveat despite certain contributions being limitation-barred.

Legal Analysis:

  • Case References:
    • Shui Ming Case: Similar issue where the court allowed the condominium corporation to maintain the caveat despite statute-barred claims.
    • Condo Corp 022 Case: Justice Arcand-Kootenay's decision countered Shui Ming, holding that a caveat cannot preserve an otherwise statute-barred action.

Court Decision:

  • Decision: The court followed Justice Arcand-Kootenay's reasoning in Condo Corp 022, ruling that the Condo Corp could not maintain the May Caveat. The caveat was ordered to be discharged from the title.
  • Costs: No costs awarded due to both parties seeking court clarification.

Conclusion:

  • Outcome: The May Caveat by Condominium Corporation 9720481 was discharged, clarifying that limitation-barred claims cannot be maintained through caveat registration. No costs or damages awarded by the court.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2310 00288
Real estate
Plaintiff