FLS Transportation Services Limited v. TRAFFIX Group Inc.
FLS Transportation Services Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
TRAFFIX Group Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Craig Swain
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Jack Heu
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Michelle Spannier
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Iliyaaz Ali
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Graham Eastwood
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Denise Mannette
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Wilson Shing
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Hannah Gale
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
William Sun
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Wilson Lee
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Sean Lowry
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Aatif Agloria
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Emma Chu
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Maria Fernanda Duarte Chacon
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Manuel David Ortiz Alvarez
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Hayley Rawle
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Zireen Shabnam Bibi
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Mary-Anne Trinh
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Haylee Mills
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Carolina Lacerda Pereira Goncalves
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Isis Roxana Zamudio Ibanez
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Ken Boyington
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

Background: FLS Transportation Services Limited, the plaintiff, sued TRAFFIX Group Inc., and several former employees including Craig Swain, Jack Heu, and others. The lawsuit centered on alleged breaches of employment duties and the misuse of confidential information by the defendants.

Key Legal Issues: FLS claimed the defendants breached their employment contracts by resigning en masse without proper notice. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendants misused FLS’s confidential information, which they transmitted to personal devices and used to solicit FLS clients. Furthermore, FLS accused the defendants of a coordinated conspiracy to harm FLS by joining TRAFFIX and exploiting its confidential information.

Held: The court granted an Anton Piller order, allowing for the search and seizure of data from the defendants’ devices to preserve evidence.

Costs/Damages Awarded: FLS was awarded costs and damages amounting to CAD 2.5 million in favor of the successful party.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S243885
Employment law
$ 2,500,000
Other