Malone v. The York Downs Golf and Country Club
Mary Malone
Law Firm / Organization
Morrison Brown Sosnovitch LLP
Margaret Pollard
Law Firm / Organization
Morrison Brown Sosnovitch LLP
Jennifer West
Law Firm / Organization
Morrison Brown Sosnovitch LLP
Suzanne Blacquier
Law Firm / Organization
Morrison Brown Sosnovitch LLP
The York Downs Golf and Country Club, Limited
The Estate of Martha Trevorrow
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Eileen Hill
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Peter Alger
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Christine Collins
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Sue Alger
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Patrick Alger
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
The National Organization of the Canadian Heart Fund
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Canadian Cancer Society
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Muscular Dystrophy Canada
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Overview:

  • York Downs sold its property in 2015 and planned to distribute net assets to shareholders, including finding several hundred "lost shareholders."
  • After ten years of search efforts, a 2022 court-approved Arrangement required shares of unlocated lost shareholders to be canceled by December 31, 2023.
  • Applicants, identified as lost shareholders late in the process, sought recognition and distribution of shares after the deadline, arguing the Arrangement was unfair and oppressive under the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA).

Key Issues:

  1. Fairness and Reasonableness: Did the Arrangement provide adequate accommodations and time for lost shareholders to validate their claims?
  2. Oppression: Did the Arrangement unfairly defeat the reasonable expectations of the lost shareholders?

Court's Analysis:

  • The court found the Arrangement fair and reasonable, balancing the need for finality with efforts to locate lost shareholders.
  • Justice McEwen previously approved the Arrangement, confirming it met statutory requirements and was in good faith.
  • Efforts to locate lost shareholders continued until the deadline, with many validating their claims through urgent court applications.
  • The Arrangement did not breach the reasonable expectations of lost shareholders, who had to comply with its terms by the set deadline.

Decision:

  • Applications dismissed without costs.
  • The court upheld the Arrangement, affirming it was fair, reasonable, and not oppressive, validating York Downs' extensive search efforts.

 

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-00715953-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 0
Respondent
05 March 2024