Liberty Mortgage Services Ltd v. Shaw
Liberty Mortgage Services Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Miles Davison LLP
Lawyer(s)

Predrag Anic

Natasha Shaw
Law Firm / Organization
Blue Rock Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Scott Chimuk

Key Points:

  • Background:

    • RVDC secured a $1.25 million loan from Liberty Mortgage Services Ltd. in 2011, guaranteed by Owen Shaw. After Owen's bankruptcy, Natasha Shaw became director and provided a personal guarantee in 2014.
    • The mortgage has not been repaid, and the defendants were noted in default on February 14, 2019.
  • Applications:

    • Liberty sought summary judgment to enforce Natasha’s personal guarantee.
    • Defendants sought to set aside the default noting, claiming defenses under various grounds.
  • Court Findings:

    • Summary judgment granted to Liberty, allowing enforcement of the guarantee.
    • Default noting against the defendants upheld; no sufficient defense or reasonable excuse for delay in applying to set aside the default.

Legal Analysis:

  • Summary Judgment:
    • No genuine issue requiring trial found, adhering to principles from Hryniak v Mauldin.
  • Setting Aside Default:
    • Defendants failed to present an arguable defense.
    • Delay in applying to set aside the default was unjustified.

Defenses Evaluated:

  • Guarantees Acknowledgement Act Compliance:
    • The guarantee met statutory requirements of the time.
  • Non-Est Factum:
    • Defense of misunderstanding the guarantee was rejected based on Natasha’s financial sophistication and evidence.
  • Joint Venture/Estoppel:
    • Insufficient evidence of a joint venture preventing enforcement. Mr. Evangelista had no ostensible authority post-2014.

Disposition:

  • Enforcement of the guarantee against Natasha Shaw for $2,588,577.26.
  • Costs awarded to Liberty.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1601-02288
Real estate
$ 2,588,577
Applicant