Quong v Lafarge Canada Inc
Garry Frederick Quong
Law Firm / Organization
Osuji & Smith Lawyers
Lafarge Canada Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
McLennan Ross LLP

Key Points:

  • Background:

    • Garry Frederick Quong, a long-term employee, was terminated after refusing a substance abuse program following a positive drug test for THC, post-incident.
    • Incident: On June 3, 2022, Quong, a Site Superintendent, was involved in a minor worksite accident. The subsequent drug test revealed THC levels above Lafarge's policy threshold.
    • Quong's Claim: Alleged wrongful dismissal, arguing the drug policy is unreasonable and that Lafarge bypassed progressive discipline measures.
  • Lafarge’s Defense:

    • Argued its actions were consistent with its Drug and Alcohol Policy, crucial for safety in a safety-sensitive workplace.
    • Asserted that Quong’s refusal to undergo the required substance abuse assessment and program necessitated his termination.
  • Court’s Analysis:

    • Policy as Employment Term:
      • The policy was an implied term of Quong’s employment, deemed reasonable, clear, well-published, and consistently enforced.
      • Essential for maintaining safety, particularly given Quong’s safety-sensitive role.
    • Reasonableness of Actions:
      • Lafarge acted reasonably by enforcing drug testing and addressing the positive results.
      • Quong’s cannabis use for pain relief, without medical authorization or prior disclosure, violated the policy.
    • Just Cause for Termination:
      • Quong’s refusal to participate in the substance abuse program and random testing was a repudiation of his employment contract.
      • The court upheld Lafarge’s requirement for program participation and testing to ensure workplace safety.
  • Conclusion:

    • Quong’s wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed. Lafarge’s enforcement of its Drug and Alcohol Policy was justified to maintain workplace safety.
    • The document does not specify a monetary award or costs ordered.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2201 09604
Employment law
Defendant