Bradcat Homes Ltd. v. Reyes
Bradcat Homes Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Bojm, Funt & Gibbons LLP
Lawyer(s)

Eric Bojm

Bean Doc Holdings Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Bojm, Funt & Gibbons LLP
Lawyer(s)

Eric Bojm

Marcario Teodoro Reyes a.k.a. Tobi Reyes
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Portfolio Asset (225Kingsway) Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Port Capital Development Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Port Capital Development (Marine) Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Portliving Development Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
South Creek Vista Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
South Creek Vista Investments Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Port Capital Development (SCL) Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Living Marine Development Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Port Capital Theporter Residences Development Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Port Capital Development (Porter Sub) Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Theporter Residences Investments Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Theporter Residences 2 Investments Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Dentons Canada LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Whitelaw Twining (WT BCA LLP)
Robert Quon
Law Firm / Organization
Whitelaw Twining (WT BCA LLP)
ABC Company 1
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ABC Company 2
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

Background: The case "Bradcat Homes Ltd. v. Marcario Teodoro Reyes" involved Bradcat Homes Ltd. and Bean Doc Holdings Ltd. as plaintiffs, and multiple defendants, including Marcario Teodoro Reyes and Dentons Canada LLP.

Key Issues: The plaintiffs sought to add Portfolio Asset Group (225 Kingsway) Limited Partnership as a plaintiff, amend their notice of civil claim to include additional details and parties, and address costs related to the application. The plaintiffs alleged that Marcario Teodoro Reyes and Dentons Canada LLP, particularly lawyer Robert Quon, breached fiduciary duties. Unauthorized mortgage transactions were conducted on a property, benefiting Reyes without the knowledge or consent of Bradcat and Bean Doc. The core issue centered on a commercial real estate development at 225 Kingsway, Vancouver. Plaintiffs invested $400,000 in the project. They claimed that the property and mortgages were mishandled by Reyes, to the detriment of the partnership. The plaintiffs aimed to initiate a common law derivative action on behalf of the partnership against the defendants for breaching fiduciary duties.

Held: The court granted the application to amend the notice of civil claim and add the Partnership as a plaintiff. It concluded there was no prejudice to the defendants and allowed the case to proceed to trial.

Costs/Damages Awarded: The court ordered that the costs of the application be costs in the cause, meaning they would be determined as part of the final resolution of the case. No specific monetary award was granted at this stage.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S235680
Corporate & commercial law
Plaintiff