Legault v. TD General Insurance Company
Shelly Legault
Law Firm / Organization
Campisi LLP
Lawyer(s)

Ashu Ismail

TD General Insurance Company
Law Firm / Organization
Isaacs Odinocki LLP

Background:

  • A fire on March 13, 2014, rendered Shelly Legault's home uninhabitable.
  • Legault claimed Additional Living Expenses (ALE) under her homeowner's insurance policy with TD, including $20,000 paid to an acquaintance, Wendy Ogden, for rent.
  • TD denied the claim after an investigation revealed that Legault's declaration about living expenses was fraudulent.
  • Legault sued TD, seeking $1 million in damages.

Trial Court Decision:

  • TD was justified in treating the policy as forfeited due to Legault’s fraudulent claim.
  • TD's counterclaim against Legault was granted.
  • Legault was ordered to pay damages and costs to TD.

Issues on Appeal:

  1. TD's Alleged Breach of Contract:

    • Legault claimed TD breached the contract by failing to provide proof of loss forms timely, maintaining her standard of living, and conducting a thorough investigation.
    • The court found that Legault’s fraud nullified any breaches by TD, and her right to recover under the policy was vitiated.
  2. Professional Witnesses:

    • Legault objected to TD paying two professional witnesses for their testimony.
    • The court upheld the trial judge's decision to allow their testimony, finding it reasonable under the circumstances.
  3. Cost Award:

    • Legault challenged the trial judge’s costs award, arguing it was excessive.
    • The appeal court found no error in the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in awarding costs.

Conclusion:

  • The appeal was dismissed.
  • TD was awarded $15,000 in costs for the appeal.

Key Points:

  • Fraudulent claims can result in complete forfeiture of insurance coverage.
  • Payments to professional witnesses are permissible under certain conditions.
  • Appeals on cost awards face a high threshold for success.

Disposition:

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to TD in the amount of $15,000.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-22-CV-0478
Insurance law
$ 15,000
Respondent