Sabok Sir v. Hill
Manigeh Sabok Sir
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Kurt Hill
Law Firm / Organization
Clark Woods LLP
Lawyer(s)

Edith Szilagyi

Background: Manigeh Sabok Sir (Appellant) appealed the decision of Judge W.G. Sheard of the Provincial Court of British Columbia regarding a dispute with Kurt Hill (Respondent). The dispute centered on Hill's handling of Sabok Sir's personal belongings.

Legal Arguments/Issues

  • Consideration in Bailment: Sabok Sir argued that a legally binding agreement existed with Hill for the storage and care of her belongings, which Hill denied.
  • Negligence: Sabok Sir claimed Hill was grossly negligent and failed to safeguard her belongings, leading to damage and theft.
  • Procedural Fairness: Sabok Sir contended that there was procedural unfairness during the trial, including restricted evidence submission and improper questioning by Hill’s counsel.
  • Factual Errors: Sabok Sir alleged Judge Sheard made several factual errors and ignored contradictory testimonies.
  • Costs Award: Sabok Sir argued against the cost award granted to Hill, claiming her case had merit and the costs were unjustified.

Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, supporting Judge Sheard's findings:

  • Bailment Relationship: Hill acted as a gratuitous bailee without consideration.
  • Duty of Care: Hill was not found grossly negligent; he took reasonable steps to store the belongings.
  • Evidence and Credibility: The inconsistencies in Hill’s testimony did not prove he stole or intentionally damaged the belongings.
  • Damages: Sabok Sir failed to prove pecuniary loss on a balance of probabilities.
  • Costs Award: The court upheld the costs award against Sabok Sir.

Costs/Damages Awarded: Manigeh Sabok Sir was ordered to pay $3,556.13 in costs to Kurt Hill.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S30349
Civil litigation
$ 3,556
Respondent