Irwin Homes Ltd. v. Wollmann et al.
Irwin Homes Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Fillmore Riley LLP
Lawyer(s)

Curran P. McNicol

Paul Wollmann
Law Firm / Organization
Pitblado LLP
Lawyer(s)

Evann Waschuk

Paul Wollmann carrying on business under the firm name and style of Paul Wollmann Stucco Wire and the said Paul Wollmann Stucco Wire
Law Firm / Organization
Pitblado LLP
Lawyer(s)

Evann Waschuk

Zimarino Holdings Ltd. formerly K & Z Masonry Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
K & Z Masonry (2011) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Civic Roofing Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Green & Dixon
Lawyer(s)

Kelly L. Dixon

Nouvelle Construction Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Marr Finlayson Pollock LLP
Lawyer(s)

Caitlin Dyck

Civil Disobedience, Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Zuber & Company LLP
Lawyer(s)

Neil C. Searles

Civil Disobedience Inc. carrying on business under the firm name and style of Dek-Rite and the said Dek-Rite
Law Firm / Organization
Zuber & Company LLP
Lawyer(s)

Neil C. Searles

Ricardo Martins
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Ricardo Martins carrying on business under the firm name and style of Xcel Concrete and the said Xcel Concrete
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

Background: Irwin Homes Ltd. v. Paul Wollmann et al. (2024 MBKB 71) involved a general contractor (Irwin Homes Ltd.) who sought damages from several subcontractors for defective construction work on a residential dwelling.

Legal Issues/Arguments: Non-settling defendants, including Paul Wollmann and Civic Roofing Inc., argued that the Pierringer Agreements prejudiced their defense by limiting pre-trial discovery and access to documents. They requested the court to impose conditions on the settlement agreements to mitigate this prejudice.

Held: The court, citing public policy favoring out-of-court settlements, granted the motion to approve the Pierringer Agreements. It dismissed the cross-claims between settling and non-settling defendants. The judge noted that non-settling defendants would have access to necessary documents and that case management powers could mitigate any prejudice.

Costs/Damages Awarded: The court approved the settlement agreements, ensuring that non-settling defendants would not be held liable beyond their share of the damages. The total amount claimed by Irwin Homes remained $315,842.30. The court allowed parties to address costs if they could not agree, with briefs to be filed in advance.

Court of King's Bench Manitoba
CI 20-01-26133
Construction law
$ 315,842
Plaintiff