Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Law Firm / Organization
Emery Jamieson LLP
Ingrid Hayden
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented

Ms. Hayden, a persistent litigant, has a long history of legal disputes, primarily against Alberta Health Services (AHS). Due to abusive litigation, she was subject to a court access restriction, requiring leave to file documents (Hayden v Hayden, 2020).

2023 Decision (ABKB 384):

  • Focus: Ms. Hayden challenged costs awarded in the foreclosure of her home initiated by CIBC.
  • Outcome: The court rejected her appeal, finding her grounds meritless and repetitive. Ms. Hayden had previously been penalized $11,000 for litigation misconduct, which was paid from the foreclosure proceeds.

2024 Decision (ABKB 139):

  • Focus: Ms. Hayden sought to challenge the distribution of foreclosure proceeds and nullify prior AHS cost orders.
  • Outcome: The court denied her applications, deeming them collateral attacks on settled matters. Further penalties were considered pointless as she continuously ignored court orders.

Outcome:

  • Foreclosure Complete: The proceeds were allocated per prior rulings, including payments to AHS.
  • No Further Penalties: The court concluded Ms. Hayden’s conduct made sanctions ineffective.
  • Next Steps: If dissatisfied, Ms. Hayden was advised to seek leave from the Supreme Court of Canada.
  • At least $55,759.37 in costs and penalties awarded against Ms. Hayden, extracted from the proceeds of the foreclosure sale of her residence.
    • $44,759.37: Outstanding costs owed by Ms. Hayden to AHS, as registered against the foreclosure proceeds.
    • $11,000: Penalties imposed on Ms. Hayden under Alberta Rules of Court (Rule 10.49(1)) for litigation misconduct, which were also paid from the foreclosure sale proceeds.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2101 08260
Civil litigation
$ 55,759
Plaintiff