Pentelechuk v Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Ltd
Darren Ward Pentelechuk
Law Firm / Organization
McLennan Ross LLP
NPS Farms Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McLennan Ross LLP
Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Lawyer(s)

Lars Olthafer

Background:

  • Parties Involved:
    • Plaintiffs: Darren Ward Pentelechuk and NPS Farms Ltd.
    • Defendant: Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Ltd.
  • The cases involve an appeal by the plaintiffs,Darren Ward Pentelechuk and NPS Farms Ltd., against a decision and compensation order of the Surface Rights Board under Section 26 of the Surface Rights Act, RSA 2000, c S-24.

Key Legal Issues:

  1. Interest Payable: Dispute over whether interest on compensation should be calculated under the Surface Rights Act or the Judgment Interest Act.
  2. Standard of Review: The appropriate standard of review for the Surface Rights Board's decision (post-Vavilov decision and pre-legislative changes).

Court Findings:

  • 2023 Decision (2023 ABKB 692):
    • The court applied the reasonableness standard of review, consistent with the principles outlined in Vavilov.
    • The appeal was partially successful. The court found that 2.63 acres of land previously deemed undevelopable were, in fact, developable based on new geotechnical evidence.
    • Compensation was adjusted for both the developable and undevelopable portions of the land.
  • 2024 Decision (2024 ABKB 283):
    • The court determined that the Judgment Interest Act does not apply since the Surface Rights Act specifically addresses the calculation of interest in such cases.
    • It confirmed that interest should be calculated from the date of the right of entry order at the Bank of Canada rate, as per the Surface Rights Act.

Conclusion:

  • The court varied the compensation payable to reflect the development potential of the land and applied interest provisions as specified under the Surface Rights Act, not the Judgment Interest Act.
  • The total monetary compensation awarded amounts to $678,800.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2103 06839
Civil litigation
$ 678,800
Defendant