Shep Enterprises Ltd. v. Cooper
SHEP ENTERPRISES LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Perry & Power
Lawyer(s)

David R. Power

KATHERINE TETFORD
Law Firm / Organization
Perry & Power
Lawyer(s)

David R. Power

MARC COOPER
Law Firm / Organization
Roebothan McKay Marshall
Lawyer(s)

Colin D. Feltham

  • Background:

    • Marc Cooper, the defendant, sought a summary judgment claiming that the professional negligence case against him was barred due to expiration under the limitations period.
    • The plaintiffs, Shep Enterprises Ltd. and Katherine Tetford, argued that Cooper failed to inform Tetford of the need for a separate employment contract, leading to her legal issues post-business sale.
  • Legal Issue:

    • The main issue was whether the claim against Cooper was statute-barred under the limitations law, specifically whether it was initiated outside the proscribed period.
  • Court's Decision:

    • The court decided not to resolve the limitation issue through a summary trial due to unresolved contradictions in evidence and credibility concerns.
    • It was deemed inappropriate to decide on the limitation defense without a full trial, where all evidence could be more thoroughly examined.
  • Outcome:

    • The limitation defense will be considered alongside the main issues of professional negligence and damages at a full trial.
    • Costs of the proceedings were deferred to be determined at the conclusion of the trial.
Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador
201701G4028
Civil litigation
Plaintiff