Seismotech IP Holdings Inc. v. Apple Canada Inc.
SEISMOTECH IP HOLDINGS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Services Juridiques SP Inc
SEISMOTECH SAFETY SYSTEMS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Services Juridiques SP Inc
JOHN DOES
Law Firm / Organization
Piasetzki & Nenniger Kvas LLP
ECOBEE TECHNOLOGIES ULC
Law Firm / Organization
Piasetzki & Nenniger Kvas LLP
APPLE INC.
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
APPLE CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Background:

  • Seismotech IP Holdings Inc. and Seismotech Safety Systems Inc. (collectively "Seismotech") own four patents related to intelligent thermostats.
  • Seismotech believes these patents have been infringed by individuals using intelligent thermostats and seeks a Norwich order against Apple Inc. and Apple Canada Inc. ("Apple") to obtain the identities of individuals who downloaded the controlling apps from Apple's App Store.
  • The aim is to sue the end-users directly for patent infringement.

Court's Analysis:

  1. Test for Norwich Order:

    • A Norwich order requires a non-party to provide information about potential defendants.
    • The key factors include the existence of a bona fide claim and the public interest.
  2. Application to Facts:

    • Lack of Bona Fide Claim:
      • Seismotech's allegations were found speculative, with no specific facts supporting patent infringement claims.
      • Their amended statements lacked clarity and detail regarding which specific components infringed the patents.
    • Public Interest:
      • Suing numerous individual consumers for infringement would impose a disproportionate burden, given the complexity and costs involved in defending patent cases.
      • The action would potentially deprive consumers of access to justice as they would lack the resources or expertise to defend themselves.

Conclusion:

  • Seismotech’s motion was dismissed due to lack of a bona fide claim and public interest concerns.
  • Seismotech was ordered to pay $8,000 in costs to Apple and $4,000 to Ecobee Technologies ULC, a Canadian thermostat manufacturer involved in the case.
Federal Court
T-1147-23; T-1148-23
Intellectual property
$ 12,000
Defendant