Miskin et al v Kholodenko et al
Gershon Miskin, in His Personal Capacity and as Trustee of the Miskin Family Trust (2015)
Law Firm / Organization
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG)
Tamara Rosenthal Miskin, in Her Capacity as Trustee of the Miskin Family Trust (2015)
Law Firm / Organization
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG)
Avi Wachsman, in His Capacity as Trustee of the Miskin Family Trust (2015)
Law Firm / Organization
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG)
Edward Kholodenko
Inna Kholdenko
Law Firm / Organization
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Lawyer(s)

Fahad Siddiqui

Aviv Kartuz
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Questrade Financial Group Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Questrade Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Questrade USA Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Questrade Wealth Management Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Doe Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Dean Percy, in His Personal Capacity and as Trustee of the Percy Family Trust (2015)
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Patrick Macdonnell, in His Capacity as Trustee of the Percy Family Trust (2015)
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Andrew Ross, in His Capacity as Trustee of the Percy Family Trust (2015)
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

- Parties: The applicants were Gershon Miskin, in His Personal Capacity and as Trustee of the Miskin Family Trust (2015), Tamara Rosenthal Miskin, in Her Capacity as Trustee of the Miskin Family Trust (2015), and Avi Wachsman, in His Capacity as Trustee of the Miskin Family Trust (2015). The respondents were Edward Kholodenko, Inna Kholdenko, Aviv Kartuz, Questrade Financial Group Inc., Questrade Inc., Questrade USA Inc., Questrade Wealth Management Inc., Doe Corporation, Dean Percy, in His Personal Capacity and as Trustee of the Percy Family Trust (2015), Patrick Macdonnell, in His Capacity as Trustee of the Percy Family Trust (2015), and Andrew Ross, in His Capacity as Trustee of the Percy Family Trust (2015).

- Subject Matter: This was a commercial list matter heard by videoconference. This case is ongoing.

- Date: The hearing was set on May 17, 2024.

- Venue: This was a case before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

- Amount: This case was valued at $0.

Commercial List
CV-24-00717995-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 0
09 April 2024
No uploaded documents