Bell Canada et al v Virutthasalam et al
Bell Canada
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Lawyer(s)

Dana Muir Peebles

Bell Expressvu Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Lawyer(s)

Dana Muir Peebles

Bell Media Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Lawyer(s)

Dana Muir Peebles

Rogers Communications Canada Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Lawyer(s)

Dana Muir Peebles

Rogers Media Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Lawyer(s)

Dana Muir Peebles

Thevakaran Virutthasalam
Law Firm / Organization
Yunusov Law Professional Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Pulat Yunusov

Moinul Alim
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Kaleb Ambaw
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Andre Bentkovskii
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Magna Bhai
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Kim Khan
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Sahkila Khan
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Harjot Oberoi
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Mustafa Mahmud
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Anurag Patel
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Mosfaqur Patwari
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Tulackashan Thavayogam
Law Firm / Organization
Stevenson Whelton LLP
Lawyer(s)

Neil G. Wilson

Raju Varma
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Gnanambikai Virutthasalam
Law Firm / Organization
Wagman Sherkin
Lawyer(s)

Charles Wagman

John Doe
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Jane Doe
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

- Parties: The plaintiffs were Bell Canada, Bell Expressvu Limited Partnership, Bell Media Inc., and Rogers Communications Canada Inc. The defendants were Thevakaran Virutthasalam, Moinul Alim, Kaleb Ambaw, Andre Bentkovskii, Magna Bhai, Kim Khan, Sahkila Khan, Harjot Oberoi, Mustafa Mahmud, Anurag Patel, Mosfaqur Patwari, Tulackashan Thavayogam, Raju Varma, Gnanambikai Virutthasalam, John Doe, and Jane Doe.

- Subject Matter: This was a commercial list matter heard by videoconference. This case is ongoing.

- Date: The hearing was set on Apr. 23, 2024.

- Venue: This was a case before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

- Amount: This case was valued at $0.

Commercial List
CV-19-00613470-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 0
29 January 2019
No uploaded documents