0731431 B.C. Ltd. v. Panorama Parkview Homes Ltd.
0731431 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel
Lawyer(s)

Joel V. Payne

Daljit Singh Mattu
Law Firm / Organization
Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel
Lawyer(s)

Joel V. Payne

0892995 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel
Lawyer(s)

Joel V. Payne

Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Parhar

Rajpreet Singh Sangha
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Parhar

Grewal Management Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel
Lawyer(s)

Joel V. Payne

Jasprit Singh Grewal
Law Firm / Organization
Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel
Lawyer(s)

Joel V. Payne

Daljit Singh Garcha
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

G.A. Phillips

Panorama Parkview Homes Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Harper Grey LLP
Lawyer(s)

John P. Sullivan

690174 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Harper Grey LLP
Lawyer(s)

John P. Sullivan

Jaswant Singh Sangha
Law Firm / Organization
Harper Grey LLP
Lawyer(s)

John P. Sullivan

Parmjit Kaur Sangha
Law Firm / Organization
Magnus Law
Lawyer(s)

Duncan Magnus

Ranjit Singh Sangha
Law Firm / Organization
Munro & Crawford
Lawyer(s)

Ronald J. Argue

Svender Singh Sangha
Law Firm / Organization
Munro & Crawford
Lawyer(s)

Ronald J. Argue

Douglas William Wills
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Balbir Kaur Dale
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Crowe MacKay & Company Ltd. in its capacity as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Jaswant Singh Sangha
Law Firm / Organization
Harper Grey LLP
Lawyer(s)

John P. Sullivan

Jaswinder Kaur Garcha
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

G.A. Phillips

  • Facts: The case involves multiple parties, including 0731431 B.C. Ltd. and others as plaintiffs, and Panorama Parkview Homes Ltd. and others as defendants, in complex commercial and insolvency proceedings. It centers around disputes over funds held in trust, payments for professional fees from these funds, and the subsequent bankruptcy of several involved parties.

  • Issue: The primary legal issue concerns the repayment of funds that were taken from trust accounts to pay for professional fees during the insolvency proceedings. The court had to determine whether the fees charged were reasonable and how much should be repaid to the trust accounts.

  • Court’s Ruling: Justice Sewell ruled that the fees taken by Crowe Mackay & Company and Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (representing the trustee and its counsel) exceeded reasonable amounts. The court ordered a repayment of fees that were deemed excessive, based on an assessment of fairness and the need to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.

  • Amount of Costs/Damages Awarded: The court ordered Crowe Mackay and Fasken to repay amounts taken above $1,000,000 from the funds held for the 2007 Joint Venturers. The exact figures adjusted for the repaid funds totaled $4,048,310, with specific amounts allocated to different parties involved. Interest on these repaid funds was also considered, with specific calculations to be determined under equitable principles and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S142529
Bankruptcy & insolvency
$ 5,048,310
Plaintiff