Mila Hills Swine v. Ontario (Minister of Agriculture)
MILA HILLS SWINE LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

URSULA VAN DEN HEUVEL O’NEIL
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

VEHOF FARMS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

JOHANNES VEHOF
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

TINA VEHOF
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

PALM CREEK FARMS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

WARREN CAUGHILL
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

JOANNE CAUGHILL
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

TOM MURRAY
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

CHERYL MURRAY
Law Firm / Organization
McKenzie Lake Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stuart Mackay

HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS
AGRICORP
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Summary:

  • Mila Hills Swine Ltd. and other plaintiffs, representing Ontario hog farmers, sued the Ontario government for negligence in the administration of a financial assistance program designed in 2007-2008.
  • The plaintiffs claimed the program’s reliance on outdated "allowable net sales" (ANS) data from 2000-2004 failed to reflect their current financial hardships, resulting in insufficient subsidy payments.
  • The Crown argued the program design was a core policy decision, immune from negligence liability, and the claim was also time-barred under the Limitations Act, 2002.

Key Points:

  • The court had to determine whether the program’s design was a policy or operational decision and if the claim was time-barred.
  • It found the decision to use outdated ANS data was a policy decision, thus protected from negligence claims under the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, 2019.
  • The plaintiffs were aware of the program’s basis on outdated data since 2008, suggesting their claim was discovered then and thus barred by the two-year limitation period.

Outcome:

  • The motion for summary judgment by the Crown was granted, dismissing the plaintiffs’ action for being based on a policy decision and time-barred. The document does not specify the total amount of costs or award ordered
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-16-00006554-0000
Civil litigation
Defendant